Coworker Relationship Communications
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Eastern Michigan University Coworker Relationship Communications QuestionI’m studying for my Communications class and need an explanation.
This paper should contain three major parts. 1. In the first part, you are to describe the nature of the relationship. Who are the participants? What is the setting? What type of relationship (e.g., romantic, friendship, family, or coworker)? In this part of the paper, you also should describe the development of the relationship using Knapp and Vangelisti’s (2008) Staircase Model of Relationship Stages (in Guerrero et al., 2020, pp. 134-146) or Baxter and Bullis’ (1985) Turning Point Analysis (in Guerrero et al., 2020, pp. 146-150). Be sure to describe any important changes in the nature of the relationship and tie these changes to the concepts covered in Guerrero et al. (2020). 2. In the second major part of the paper, you are to apply at least one of the theoretical positions covered in Guerrero et al. (2020, pp. 99-126) to your relationship. Your task in this part is to explain the development of the relationship in terms of these theories. How do these theories describe/explain the changes in your relationship? Were the predictions that each theory makes consistent with what occurred in your relationship? If you use both uncertainty reduction and predicted outcome value, try to show how their different predictions are relevant to your relationship. 3. In the third and final (and typically shortest) part of the paper, you are to evaluate the theory discussed in your paper. The major evaluative criterion should be how easy or difficult you found it to describe or explain the changes in your relationship using that theory. Are the theories easy or difficult to apply to an actual relationship? In addition, are the theories’ predictions consistent with what went on in your relationship? If not, is this a problem with the theory? What kinds of changes would you recommend the developers make to their theory (if any)?
This paper is worth a maximum of 80 points. Grading will focus on the extent to which you achieve the goals of each of the three parts of the paper. Evaluation centers, first, on the completeness of the description, application, and/or evaluation. This represents the extent to which you describe theoretical positions accurately and the extent to which you effectively integrate course material into the descriptions or evaluations. In addition, the overall presentation of the paper (i.e., spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) will be evaluated. Relationship papers must be double-spaced, use standard margins (i.e., 1 inch on all sides), use 12-point Times New Roman font, and should not exceed 10 pages in length (not including tables, figures, graphs, references, etc., if any). Given the nature of the assignment, it does not seem that this paper could be less than 3 or 4 pages and still be complete. I expect that relationship papers will generally be in the 5–7 page range. Evaluation centers, first, on the completeness of the description, application, and/or evaluation. This represents the extent to which you describe theoretical positions accurately, and the extent to which you effectively integrate course material into the descriptions or evaluations. In addition, the overall presentation of the paper (i.e., spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) will be evaluated. For more information, see the rubric on Canvas. Relationship papers must be double-spaced, use standard margins (i.e., 1 inch on all sides), use 12-point Times New Roman (or equivalent) font, and should not exceed 10 pages in length (not including tables
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!