Creation of States in Asia 5000–500 B.C.E.

March 15, 2021

Description

Use the Study GUIDE PDF TO READ CHAPTER 3 PAGE 20
Chapter Three:
Settlers and Migrants: Creation of States in Asia 5000 – 500 B.C.E. Complete the Overview questions and Making Connections. How did peoples living in far-flung regions of Asia develop societies that had many similarities?

2.What were the unique characteristics of the cultures studied here?
3.Which features of ancient Indian and Chinese society and culture shaped later developments most fundamentally?
4.What common trends in the interactions between settled and nomadic peoples can you discern?
MAKING CONNECTIONS
1.How did the development of Indus Valley cities compare with the processes in Southwest Asia and China?
2.How does the social structure of Vedic India compare with those of other ancient Asian and North African cultures?
3.In what ways do the interactions between settled and nomadic peoples explain the historical development of Asia?
4.What are the similarities in burial practices of the ancient cultures we have discussed so far, and what do they suggest about attitudes toward class and religion in these societies?
For further research into the topics covered in this chapter, see the Bibliography at the end of the book

The other two screenshots are the sources documents and the questions for that is

Examining the Evidence
1. According to Chapter III, how should male members of the household treat women?
2. What would you conclude about the status of women from reading this chapter alone?
3. What are a woman’s duties according to The Laws of Manu, and (from reading only this chapter) what behavior should women avoid?

Critical Elements

Distinguished

(100%)

Proficient

(85%)

Basic

(70%)

Below Expectations

(50%)

Non-Performance

(0%)

Thesis Statement

Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.

Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.

The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Counter Argument

Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.

Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.

The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion

– Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.

Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.

Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.

Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay, however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.

The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.