Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats
Article: “Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats” (pp. 401-408)
Source: Businessweek Author: Michael Lipsky Date of Article: May 25, 1980
Link to Article: (place link here)
Article Summary
“Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats” examines the role of front-line public employees in the bureaucracy. Street-level bureaucrats are those individuals who interact directly with citizens. There are many street-level bureaucrats in public service agencies such as welfare offices. In fact, it seems that the poorer people are, the more street-level bureaucrats affect them. Since street-level bureaucrats have such a great deal of interaction with the public, they are often the focus of public controversy. Their decisions appear to be very personal, as they are directed toward people and their attitudes are obvious. Because of this personalization of bureaucracy, street-level bureaucrats also provide hope for citizens to receive fair and effective treatment, as citizens believe they can reason with these individuals, even if the rest of the bureaucracy is out of reach. In reality, street-level bureaucrats are limited to how responsive they may be. Protocol restricts their abilities to treat things on a case-by-case basis.
Key Points
- Street-level bureaucrats cause a great deal of public controversy due to debates over their scope and function and the impact they have on people’s lives.
- Street-level bureaucrats, such as police officers, teachers, and health workers are familiar to the people they serve, but not necessarily as accountable as people would like them to be.
- Street-level bureaucracies directly affect people and change their lives. This provides people with hope that these bureaucrats will help them on an individual basis.
- Street-level bureaucrats provide a “visible, accessible, and blamable, collective target.”
Your Opinion
Include four to six sentences that reflect your opinion about the information in the article.
Instructions for Article Summary
Your article must be on a topic that is similar to the material covered in the chapter and be no more than 30 days old.
Your summary should be in the format above. Use Times New Roman 12 point font and 1” margins. Include your name and date as a header in the top right corner of your paper.
The summary itself should be 8-10 sentences in length and be a summary of the article. Do not simply repeat sentences that are in the article.
You need 3 to 5 main points from your article. Do not simply repeat what you have in the summary. These main points should be one complete sentence each.
Your opinion is to appear at the end and consists of 4 to 6 sentences about what you think of the information in the article. If you write something simple such as, “I agree with the author.”, that does not count as one of your sentences.
You must include a link to your article.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Critical Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats