Cross Cultural Management Class Project
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Cross Cultural Management Class Project
There are three sections to this paper.
Assume that they are a consultant working for an American firm responsible for providing training to expatriates on international assignments. Prepare a training package that would be used to provide expatriates with a foundation for living and working in the country. Draw on available online library research (and include proper citation and references) and may also supplement with interviews with managers who have lived or worked in this country.
The report should include:
- A cultural analysis: The cultural roots of a country are reflected in the arts, literature, and mass media of that society. Select one form of art, literature, or mass media to understand the culture of that country. Describe specific examples of this aspect of the culture, then identify the underlying beliefs and values reflected in these examples. Discuss the similarities and differences between American culture and the culture of the country you choose. Do not focus only on history or geography, but also on cultural beliefs, values, and norms.
- A description of the current practices that American firms use to train professionals for assignments in your country of choice. You can use online LIRN library research, supplemented with interviews.
- A PowerPoint presentation on living and working in your country of choice.
Note: The Project will be 7 pages, 6 pages of the subject and a Reference Page in APA Format.
A PowerPoint presentation will be 4 slides long, on living and working in your country of choice.
Home>Applied Sciences homework help>Medical Laws and Ethics
Running head: HIPAA SECURITY AND PRIVACY RULES 1
HIPAA SECURITY AND PRIVACY RULES 4
HIPAA security and privacy rules
Kristina Comer
Medical Law and Ethics
Robert Feightner
4/13/2014
HIPAA violations are a main concern in healthcare industry, and its fulfillment is one of the most significant factors to a health organization’s achievement. The HIPAA Security and Privacy rules were made to guarantee personal health information of a patient is kept secure and private. Enforcing the Privacy and Security laws process requires the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), which uses three methods to guarantee that the healthcare professionals comply with the rules. To begin with, all the complaints are assessed through a thorough investigation process (Stephen, 2003).
When the compliant has been acknowledged for investigation the healthcare provider and the submitting party shall be contacted, where more details shall be composed and assessed.
By law, any specialized health care concerned with violations claim is mandatory to oblige with the investigations. Most HIPAA violations complains are resolved and closed after finding out that covered entity was operating in compliance of the laws. Another method is by reaching out to the enclosed entities and offering training and education to assist in fostering of full accepting and complying with the requirements of the laws. In cases where noncompliance is detected, ruling can be made through a voluntary compliance, instantaneous corrective act, or conformity upon a ruling (Stephen, 2003).
The OCR can partner with the Department of Justice to work jointly on creating potential criminal charges. When resolution method has been recognized, and the health care expert does not meet the necessities as well as comply with it, a sudden fine can be issued.
The OCR moderates fulfillment with comprehensive reviews of enclosed entities to guarantee that they are working in compliance with the law. An example of a HIPAA violation and how it impacts one as a health care professional is viewed between prestige and a client.
A pharmacist at Prestige health care where I work gave medicine to his neighbor and noticed that the neighbor had been diagnosed with HIV AIDS. He went home and informed his wife who spread the rumor and when John had about it, it affected him since withdrew from him. John filed a lawsuit against Prestige and claimed it was accountable for the HIPAA violation since it failed to train, teach and supervise its employee (Stephen, 2003). Prestige disputed that the pharmacist went beyond his job duties and was not accountable for the breach. The jury disagreed and the jury decided prestige was not accountable for the breach. The jury and the judge decide prestige was responsible for 80% of the compensation owed to the plaintiff. Prestige has already agreed to appeal.
Reference
Health, (2013). Protecting personal health information in research: understanding the HIPAA
privacy rule (03-5388). Retrieved from website: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pdf/HIPAA_Privacy_Rule_Booklet.pdf
Cross Cultural Management Class Project
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow