Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
EEOC Diversity and Discrimination Business Law
Objective
Understand and analyze the legal consequences of discriminatory conduct and the role of the EEOC
Assignment Overview
In this case study and writing assignment, you argue whether the EEOC should proceed to file a discrimination lawsuit against a manufacturer for gender discrimination
Deliverables
PLEASE READ THE COURSE SYLLABUS SECTION CONCERNING ASSIGNMENTS AND THE GRADING RUBRIC BELOW TO MAXIMIZE POINTS. Submit ONE, two-to-three page (minimum 250 word), double spaced, Word document in Times New Roman, font size 12. Please make sure your response complies with the MLA format. See owl.purdue.edu. Please review the Student Writing Guide and Plagiarism presentation within the same Module as this assignment. If
you are uncertain concerning the proper method for using quotation marks or citing sources, please
review these USF Library tutorials. guides.lib.usf.edu/commerce”? =451607&p=4980659
Step 1 Research
Closely review the discrimination laws in Chapter 30 of your textbook paying particular attention to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the gender discrimination discussion and do any additional research you believe necessary.
Step 2 Assume and Analyze these Facts
AB Pneumatics, Inc. manufactures hydraulic ram systems for motor vehicle lifts with 100 employees in a facility consisting of two buildings and a parking lot. The buildings are an older, small, administrative office and a large manufacturing plant. The older administrative building houses four male managers and six female clerical employees and contains separate bathrooms for male and female employees.
The new manufacturing plant was built six months ago and has 80 male and 10 female employees working there. Plant employees receive two, ten-minute work breaks and one 45-minute lunch break per shift. However, the new plant has only one bathroom for male employees only. Female plant employees on break are required to leave the plant facility and walk across an open parking lot to the older administrative building to use the female bathroom located there.
Step 3 Write a Legal Argument
Assume you are a junior attorney working for the EEOC. In a minimum 250-word (double spaced Word document) original paper, summarize the results of your analysis of the facts and law and give your reasoned opinion to your supervisor whether the EEOC should file a lawsuit for gender discrimination against the company and what remedies or relief the EEOC should seek. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE!
CSU Construction of The Train Responses
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
CSU Construction of The Train Responses |
CSU Construction of The Train Responses