Cultural differences in attitudes towards social class
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Cultural differences in attitudes towards social class
Attitudes towards social class can vary greatly across different cultures. Social class refers to the hierarchical divisions within society based on factors such as wealth, occupation, education, and social status. In some cultures, social class is highly valued, while in others, it is viewed with suspicion or even contempt.
In many Western cultures, social class is often seen as a reflection of personal achievement, with the belief that hard work and determination can lead to upward social mobility. This is known as the “American Dream” and is a core belief in the United States. In these cultures, people may view those of a higher social class as successful, hard-working, and deserving of their status. However, there may also be a belief that those of a lower social class are lazy or lacking in ambition, and therefore not deserving of success.
In contrast, many Asian cultures place a higher value on social harmony and group cohesion. Social class may be seen as less important in these cultures, with greater emphasis on the collective good rather than individual achievement. In Japan, for example, social class is often determined by birth, and there is less emphasis on upward social mobility.
Cultural differences in attitudes towards social class
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow