Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Data Analysis And Visualization Discussion
Data Analysis And Visualization Discussion
Consider the following examples of visualizations or infographics, and consider how the context has changed:
All of your document’s sections should be labeled.
What suggestions do you have for making the selected project productively interactive if it is a static work? How would you approach the design if it had to be compatible with both mobile and desktop devices?
What ideas do you have for potentially distributing the same project as static work if the selected project was an interactive work? What concessions do you think you’ll have to make in terms of interactive features that aren’t feasible right now?
What about the different types of annotations that could be applied? Explain all of the annotations, color, composition, and other aspects of the visualization in detail.
What more data points should be taken into account, and why?
Explain the differences in the graphic using updated data and the tool of your choice (that we’ve used in the course).
Show the visual (before and after modifications) and then completely respond to the questions above. Make your response as detailed as possible. It should be at least three pages long and include at least two peer-reviewed references.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Data Analysis And Visualization Discussion |
Data Analysis And Visualization Discussion