Data Structures Project Statements Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Data Structures Project Statements Discussion
You need to peer-evaluate the Project Statements of your three other classmates.
You need to upload the PDF here at “Project Statement Peer Evaluation”. The statements assigned to you to evaluate can be found inside the “Project Statement” assignment -> Assigned Peer Reviews. The detailed guide with screenshots can be found at https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/Student-Guide/How-do-I-submit-a-peer-review-to-an-assignment/ta-p/293 (Links to an external site.) along with video tutorial athttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkgPvezGpX8. (Links to an external site.)
Consider the following rubric while evaluating,
The project statement describes an innovative and interesting problem – <Points you award> out of 20 points
The project statement is clear, understandable, contains required components, and follows the suggested structure – <Points you award> out of 60 points
The project statement describes an innovative approach of solving a well-known problem – <Points you award> out of 20 points
Detailed, constructive comments of at least 25 words and almost 50 words in explaining your reasons for the above-awarded points. These comments could also contain a description of further “How can this Problem Statement be improved?”
Upload the PDF containing the following,
<Your evaluation following the above rubric for the first project statement>
<Your evaluation following the above rubric for the second project statement>
<Your evaluation following the above rubric for the third project statement>
Data Structures Project Statements Discussion
Data Structures Project Statements Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Data Structures Project Statements Discussion
Data Structures Project Statements Discussion