Decision-making models for managers
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Decision-making models for managers
Decision-making is a crucial aspect of managerial roles, as managers are responsible for making choices that impact their organizations’ success. To facilitate effective decision-making, managers often rely on decision-making models. These models provide a structured framework for assessing and evaluating alternatives, considering potential risks and benefits, and making informed decisions. Here are some commonly used decision-making models for managers:
Rational Decision-Making Model:
The rational decision-making model follows a systematic and logical approach. It involves identifying the problem, generating alternative solutions, evaluating the alternatives based on criteria, selecting the best option, and implementing and evaluating the decision. This model assumes that decision-makers have access to complete information and make decisions to maximize their organizations’ outcomes.
Bounded Rationality Model:
In contrast to the rational model, the bounded rationality model recognizes that managers have limited cognitive abilities and access to information. They make decisions based on heuristics and satisfice (select the first acceptable alternative), rather than thoroughly evaluating all possible options. This model acknowledges that decision-making is often subject to time constraints and limited resources.
Incremental Decision-Making Model:
The incremental model suggests that managers make decisions by building on existing solutions or gradually adapting strategies. It involves making small, incremental adjustments to decisions based on feedback and learning from previous experiences. This model is suitable for complex and uncertain situations where making radical changes may be risky.
Intuitive Decision-Making Model:
Intuition-based decision-making relies on managers’ experience, gut feelings, and unconscious knowledge to make decisions quickly. It is often used in situations where there is limited time or inadequate information. Managers who possess expertise and have encountered similar situations can rely on their intuition to make effective decisions.
Participative Decision-Making Model:
The participative model involves involving relevant stakeholders, such as employees or team members, in the decision-making process. It fosters collaboration, information sharing, and diverse perspectives. By including individuals who will be affected by the decision, managers can leverage their expertise, enhance commitment, and generate better solutions.
Ethical Decision-Making Model:
Ethical decision-making models emphasize the importance of considering moral principles and values in decision-making. These models typically involve assessing the ethical implications of different options, weighing the potential consequences, and selecting the course of action that aligns with ethical standards and organizational values.
Decision Tree Analysis:
Decision tree analysis is a visual representation of decision-making that involves mapping out alternative courses of action, along with their potential outcomes and associated probabilities. It helps managers understand the risks and benefits of different options and make decisions based on their desired outcomes.
Each of these decision-making models has its own advantages and limitations. Managers should choose the most appropriate model based on the specific situation, available resources, time constraints, and the complexity of the decision at hand. By utilizing these decision-making models, managers can improve the quality of their decisions, enhance their problem-solving abilities, and drive organizational success.
Decision-making models for managers
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow