Defining Myself as a Leader Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Defining Myself as a Leader Discussion
Devan Pouncy
Capella University
Professor: Kristine Ziola-Pardell
FPX5002
November 2, 2021
Please be sure to review all my comments throughout your assessment. Please note that I only point out an error occurrence once and it is your responsibility to look for other possible occurrences.
Defining Myself as a Leader
Leadership is one of the key aspects that influence the success of any organization, whether private or public. An effective leader is a person who shares their vision with the followers, leads by example, communicates effectively, motivates, inspires, and empowers others, and makes hard decisions. The paper explores my leadership strengths identified through Zenger Folkman’s 360-degree strengths assessment and feedback from current workplace colleagues and friends. Further, the paper discusses what I learned from the feedback and highlights growth opportunities related to my leadership skills.
This is a good assessment to help discover/confirm who you are as a leader and why you are who you are.
Please note the requirement is:
Read about, take, and reflect upon at least three of the following assessments; each should take about 20–30 minutes.
Strengths, Skills, and Positives Revealed in the Assessment
I used Zenger Folkman’s 360-degree strengths tool to assess my leadership strengths. The assessment can be found at https://zengerfolkman.com/8-minute-strengths-assessment/. According to Zenger and Folkman (2013), the test, which takes approximately eight minutes, effectively establishes one’s leadership competencies. I learned from the assessment that I establish stretch goals, solve problems and analyze issues, display high honesty and integrity, and motivate and inspire others to high performance. Additionally, I value diversity, communicate prolifically and powerfully, and make effective decisions. The results reinforce what I already thought about myself. I currently use the strengths in my organization and my interactions with friends and family members. What are examples of how you currently use these strengths.
As indicated above, you will need to complete at least two more assessments, analyze the results, share the results, and provide examples of how you are currently using these strengths.
Summary of Responses
I sought feedback regarding my leadership skills from my friend, my former manager, and two current workplace colleagues. From their responses, I established that I am an effective communicator. Besides, I learned that I give timely feedback, command responsibility, show commitment to what I am doing, have focus, and demonstrate self-awareness regarding my potential as a leader. The responses partly fit with what I already knew about myself. For instance, I do not consider myself an effective communicator since my public speaking skills are less developed. Also, I did not consider myself as a person who provides timely feedback. I sometimes become preoccupied with my schedule and forget what others expect from me.
Asking those who know you best is a great way to discover how you are perceived by others.
Personal statement as a Leader
As a leader, I am a person who empowers others to achieve organizational objectives. I can communicate concise and clear goals and inspire and motivate followers to work towards achieving these goals. Besides, I believe in results orientation, focusing on what has the most significant impact on the company. Furthermore, I believe that employees must be appreciated for their work through reward strategies, professional development, and timely feedback.
Once you complete the required number of assessments, please be sure that your leadership statement reflects all results.
Areas that I Learned are Growth Opportunities
I feel that the most important areas to strengthen are those that I scored poorly in the 360-degree assessment and received unsatisfactory feedback from my friend and colleagues and. The areas include teamwork and collaboration, and initiative-taking, which made me realize the need for improvement. To enhance these skills and qualities, I will take various steps, including learning how to resolve minor issues in teamwork and avoiding elements that hinder my involvement in group projects, such as bias and sideline arguments. On the other hand, I will improve my initiative-taking skills by working on my confidence, sharing my ideas for workplace improvement, anticipating any upcoming issues, and discussing them with colleagues and the management. Also, I will start participating in projects that others avoid.
Once you complete the required number of assessments, please be sure that your growth opportunities reflect all results.
Conclusion
The 360-degree assessment and feedback from my colleagues were critical in highlighting my leadership strengths and weaknesses. I have learned that I value diversity, make effective decisions, motivate others, offer quick feedback, show commitment, command responsibility, and communicate effectively. Furthermore, I learned that I need to improve my innovativeness, teamwork and collaboration, and initiative ability. The improvement is critical for my effective leadership in my current and future workplace.
Reference
Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2013). The Eight-Minute Test That Can Reveal Your Effectiveness as a Leader. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/08/how-effective-a-leader-are-you
Devan,
When establishing who you are as a leader and why you are who you are it is important to complete a well-rounded number of assessments. You may find that additional assessments show you additional strengths.
You will need to complete at least two more assessments and include the results as indicated above.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results