Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Deliverable Mary Magdalene Discussion Essay Paper
Deborah Butterfield, Rory, 1992, Assemblage
Overview
The way an artist manipulates form (medium, visual elements, design principles) in a work of art directly impacts the content, or how the work is understood by the viewer. Moreover, great masters such as Donatello, Rembrandt, and Van Gogh often pushed the boundaries of materials to explore creative approaches that were very different from prevailing trends.
Many artists after World War II also became disenchanted with conventional approaches to making art. They couldn’t see themselves painting something as banal as a vase of flowers or a reclining nude after witnessing the atomic bomb, global destruction, and the death of millions during the Holocaust. As a result, artists began to look for new materials and approaches to help them celebrate their personal identity and better express how they felt about the world. New content called for a new expressive approach.
Assemblage
Assemblage was the most important new approach, but it was not a medium in the traditional sense. Assemblage artists work extensively with found, recycled, and discarded materials. Pablo Picasso, Joseph Cornell, Robert Rauschenberg, Bruce Conner, Betye Saar, and Edward Kienholz, among others, are all notable artists who worked in Assemblage.
To help inform your Discussion post, please watch this short video about Assemblage:
Your Assignment
In this Discussion, you will write and post a 550-750 word Formal Analysis (also referred to as Visual Analysis) in which you describe and examine the form of a work of art, especially what the medium and composition contribute to its visual power and meaning. Learning how to correctly write a Formal Analysis is a key skill you will develop during this course.
This is not a research paper, but is a paper based on your own observations and original thought. I want you to learn to write about art because it forces you to think critically about what you see, what is visually evident, then examine your thoughts and articulate them clearly. Clear writing issues from clear thinking!
This Discussion is worth 100 points. Please read the instructions and Grading Rubric before you begin.
Due Date
Your first post to this Discussion is due by Sunday, March 13 at 11:59 p.m.
Your responses to posts by at least two different classmates are due by Sunday, March 20 at 11:59 p.m.
You must post in the Discussion before you can read your classmates’ posts.
Instructions and Grading Criteria
Before you begin, be sure to review the entire weekly module to better understand the Formal Analysis process. Take notes as you watch each of the videos, and carefully read the entire written commentary on each page in the module. If you are not clear about any of the concepts, or if you are unsure about how to complete this assignment, don’t hesitate to contact me via Canvas Inbox and I will help you.
To earn a high grade, I expect you to correctly apply concepts and terminology from the readings and videos. In addition, you are required to support your key points with frequent observations of the work of art.
For more help, refer to this Guide to the Visual Elements and Principles of Design
Important! Approach this discussion as you would if you were writing a college paper. In other words, don’t just start writing in the discussion board without having a plan. I recommend that you open a Word document and write a polished 550-750 word paper, then copy and paste this into your discussion post.
Step One: Select an Artist (listed below)
In each of the images listed at the bottom of this page, the artist has used materials in a unique way that makes a powerful visual statement.
Before you make your selection or write your post, scroll all the way to the bottom of this page and review all the images and linked content and videos. As you review the content, take notes. Then select a work of art that you find engaging or that piques your curiosity. Write about the work of art because you care.
Step Three: Respond to Two Classmates
Each post is worth 10 possible points (20 points total)
Next, review the posts of your classmates. Post a thorough and cogent response to a post by two different classmates (at least 100 words each). Add a new insight to the discussion that helps the reader better understand the work of art. To do this consider the following:
Do you agree with your classmate’s analysis and interpretation? Why or why not?
Did they leave out something important? If you think so, introduce this to the discussion.
Did you find something interesting in the post, but you don’t fully understand? Politely ask them to clarify for you.
Grading
This Discussion topic is broadly framed and there is no right or wrong answer. Instead, you will be graded on how well you demonstrate your ability to think clearly about this topic and logically support your ideas with concepts from the readings, videos, online content (see links below), as well as your own observations, ideas and insights.
Before you submit your posts, take a little more time to proofread and revise your work to make sure that what you write actually conveys what you intend to say. Your posts must be clearly-written, well-supported, grammatically correct, and free of spelling and punctuation errors. This is a college level assignment!
Please review the Grading Rubric before you begin. You can view the Grading Rubric by clicking the three dots in the upper right of this page, then click “Show Rubric.” Here are more instructions for viewing the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.).
Earn a High Grade
Before you begin, read all of the instructions, as well as the rubric.
Focus on the key ideas contained in the weekly reading, videos, and links to this page.
Start with an outline and organize your main points into separate topical paragraphs.
Write concise and complete sentences that clearly convey what you intend to say.
Write in third person, present tense, as much as possible.
Support your statements with careful observations about each work of art.
Include your own insights that support your main points.
Assignment Feedback
I care very much about the quality of the work you submit and I will carefully read, evaluate, and provide feedback on your post within approximately one week after you submit responses to your classmates (usually sooner).
As you can imagine, this takes time and I appreciate your patience while I assess your work.
Click this link for instructions on how to view assignment comments from your instructor. (Links to an external site.)
Research
This is not a research paper. However, it may be beneficial for you to do some very basic research about the artist and the image. If you do, look at other works by the artist to gain insights about their artistic vision. Try to identify and include at least one big idea you find. Be sure to cite your sources and paraphrase this idea in your own words. Contact me and I can show you how to do this. In most cases you can cite the url for an online source in parentheses after the section in your paper where the reference occurs.
Do not Plagiarize
If I find that you have appropriated any ideas or text without giving proper credit to the person or persons who created them, you will receive a zero for this assignment. No exceptions. Please familiarize yourself with the Academic Honesty/Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policies for this course.
Images
I’ve selected these works of art because they represent a diverse range of materials, artists, and viewpoints. Another big reason is because they include many of my personal favorites and I can’t wait to read what you have to say about them!
Tara Donovan
Click this image to watch a video about the work of Tara Donovan.
Tara Walker, Untitled (Styrofoam Cups), 2004-2008, Installation
Kara Walker
Click this image to watch a video about the work of Kara Walker.
Kara Walker, Renaissance society installation, 1997
Alex Couwenberg
Click either image below to watch a really terrific short video about how Alex makes his work.
Alex Couwenberg, Starwood, 2008, Acrylic on canvas
Alex Couwenberg, Kona, 2006, Acrylic on canvas
Deborah Butterfield
Click the image below and go to the Artnet website where you can explore Butterfield’s work.
Deborah Butterfield, Yellow River, 1984, Assemblage
Click the image below to watch a short video about the work of Debra Butterfield.
Debra Butterfield, Silver Star, 2013, Cast bronze with patina
Joseph Cornell
Click the image, below, for a link to a website about Joseph Cornell and his art.
Joseph Cornell, Untitled (The Hotel Eden), 1945, box art assemblage
Click the image, below, for a link to a terrific article about Joseph Cornell.
Joseph Cornell, Medici Boy, 1952, Box art assemblage
Click this image (below) to go to an amazing interactive website based on Cornell’s artwork.
Joseph Cornell, Untitled (Soap Bubble Set), 1936, Box art assemblage
Käthe Kollwitz
Click the image below to read a good article about Käthe Kollwitz.
Käthe Kolwitz, Battlefield, 1907, Etching, The Art Institute of Chicago
Rembrandt van Rijn
Click the image below and go to the Norton Simon Museum website. When you arrive, click the image again to take a closer look. This is considered to be one of the most dynamic prints ever made.
Rembrandt van Rijn, Three Crosses, third state, 1653, Drypoint
Unlike other printmaking processes, Intaglio printing allows the artist to make changes to the printing plate between proofs. Notice the dramatic changes that occur between the early and later states of this image. Rembrandt pioneered this process. Click the image, below, to watch a video that will help you interpret Rembrandt.
Rembrandt van Rijn, Three Crosses, fourth state, 1653, Drypoint
Donatello
Click this image, below, to watch a video about Donatello’s Mary Magdalene.
Donatello, Mary Magdelene, 1455, Wood sculpture
Vincent Van Gogh
Click this image to watch a first rate biography of Vincent Van Gogh. Watch at least the first two episodes (15 minutes each). If you want to learn about what drove Vincent to paint, this is the video to watch.
Vincent Van Gogh, The Night Cafe, 1888, Oil on canvas
David Alfaro Siqueiros
Click the image, below, for a link to a website about Siquieros and his art.
David Alfaro Siqueiros, Echo of a Scream, 1937, enamel on wood
Banksy
Click this image to watch a terrific video about Banksy (14 minutes).
Banksy, Stop and Search (Girl and a Soldier), Bethlehem, 2007
Banksy, Cameraman and Flower, Park City, 2010
Banksy, Umbrella Girl, New Orleans
Banksy, No Trespassing, San Francisco, 2010
James Turrell – Roden Crater (earthwork)
Click the image below to watch a video about the Roden Crater (LACMA).
James Turrell, Roden Crater, interior, Earthwork
Please click the image below to visit the Roden Crater website.
James Turrell, Roden Crater, interior, Earthwork
Please click the image below to visit the James Turrell website.
James Turrell, Roden Crater, interior, Earthwork
James Turrell, Roden Crater, exterior, Earthwork
Be sure to write your initial post in the first “reply” box you see below.
watch the video to help you
How to do visual (formal) analysis in art history – YouTube
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Deliverable Mary Magdalene Discussion Essay Paper |
Deliverable Mary Magdalene Discussion Essay Paper