Determinants of Economic Growth the Midnight Economist
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Determinants of Economic Growth the Midnight Economist
Most agree that producing more of what we want most is a good thing; but they can see that growth is complex in prerequisite and process and hard to sustain in a stingy world.
What are the immediate determinants of economic growth? Many things. Some analysts—including economist Arnold Harberger in a publication of the Institute
for Contemporary Studies—have tried to classify them.
Economic growth entails production, and production entails combining productive inputs into commodity outputs. Given climate and endowments of nature,
aggregate output depends on the quantity, the quality, and the efficiency of use of scarce labor and capital. What, in turn, determines the quantity, quality, and
efficiency of labor and capital?
The quantity of labor is a function not only of the size of population but also of the proportion of the population in the labor force and of the proportion of the
labor force which is employed. The amount of capital stems from net rates of saving and investing, not only domestically but also by world financial partners.
Questions of quality are more subtle. The quality of labor services is affected by health and age composition and occupational distribution, by education and
technological knowledge and general cultural attributes, by on-the-job training and work experience and managerial direction. The quality of capital is intertwined
with the quality of some kinds of labor. It reflects at any given time the state of the industrial arts—the level of production knowledge applied from the
accumulation of knowledge available. And over time, in global competition, just to stay in the same place, a community must run fast through improvement in
designs and technical innovation.
For growth, resources of substantial amount and of high quality still must be used efficiently.
Somehow—through processes of acquiring information and of applying optimal decision rules—we are to shift workers and capital from lower-productivity to higher-productivity activities, developing appropriate specialization and division of labor, exploiting economies of scale, and innovating new products.
More than two centuries ago, Adam Smith concluded that the quality of resources and the efficiency of their use are more important than their quantity. The poorest nations, he noted, have the largest working proportions of population. What primarily determines how well we live is, as Smith put it, “the skill, dexterity and judgment with which [our] labor is generally applied.” That is still true.
Questions for Thought and Discussion:
- Why isn’t there a single “correct” recipe for economic growth?
- Does increasing investment necessarily increase economic growth?
- Which of the determinants of economic growth are not a function of property rights?
- What is the most important factor for sustained economic growth? Why?
Harcourt Brace & Company 247
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results