Develop Steps to Avoid or Control Persistent Attacks
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Develop Steps to Avoid or Control Persistent Attacks
Scenario:
You are employed as a cybersecurity analyst at NCU-FSB, a financial organization that has invested in establishing a security program but is in the process of developing a risk management strategy. This means that there is a critical need for implementing risk reduction strategies to prevent intrusions or attacks, like monitoring and response strategies, security awareness, training, and systems administration tools. In the second month of working for the organization, a user received a phishing email from a foreign country. After opening and reading the email, the user’s computer was compromised. Using ARP caching, the attacker was able to sniff password hashes and crack them, which escalated to spear-phishing and whaling attacks (domino effect). The attack or intrusions have been there for months, making it an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) related attack. ARP stands for address resolution protocol, used to connect layer 2 of the OSI model, data link layer with layer 3 of the OSI model, network.
Instructions:
For this assignment, you must create a technical paper with an illustrated workflow diagram that examines the root cause of an incident or source of attacks and presents action steps to avoid or control different types of persistent internal and external attacks.
This workflow diagram will be included in your corporate risk management plan. You can use software tools like MS-Visio, Edraw, Lucidchart, LibreOffice, or any drawing tool to create your workflow diagram or infographic.
Your illustrated workflow should include the following:
Steps to assess, respond and mitigate a threat
Assessment tools and measures
Checklist to certify perimeter protection
Your paper should include:
Nature of the agency or business
Framework to be followed
Rationale for the adoption of the selected framework
Relevant laws or standards
Steps for framework adoption
Changes needed to fit the operations or services
Best practices for security and risk mitigation
Software solution recommendations
Length: 3 page academic paper
Resources: Minimum of 3 scholarly resources not more than 5 years old
The completed assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Include a palgiarism report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results