Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Developing a Case on Faisal Shazad
Paper details:
Research Paper Utilizing homegrown violent extremist Faisal Shahzad at Times Square in 2010, write a research (not opinion) paper by developing your own case study that addresses the four subject areas below: 1. What was the individual or groups grievance or cause? 2. How was the individual or most group members recruited or draw to the cause? 3. What was the process of radicalization? Which model discussed in this course most closely followed your case? 4. What was the result of the extremism and how did the case end? Technical guidance: – Minimum 6 pages of content (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit) – Written according to the APA 7th edition style and format (parenthetical in-text citation formats only; not end notes or footnotes). – Times New Roman, 12 point, 1″ margins, double space. – Free of grammar, usage, and style errors. – Minimum 10 scholarly articles are to be used (books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc).
Developing a Case on Faisal Shazad
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Developing a Case on Faisal Shazad