Developing Measurable Learning Objectives 1
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Developing Measurable Learning Objectives 1
Running head: DEVELOPING MEASURABLE LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1
DEVELOPING MEASURABLE LEARNING OBJECTIVES 2
Week 1: Developing Measurable Learning Objectives
Your Name
EDU 645: Assessment for Learning
Instructor’s Name
Date
Hint : Delete all of these green boxes before submitting the paper to your instructor. To delete the boxes: click on the edge of each box and press delete.
Hint : For help completing this assignment: Read Chapter 4 : Instructional Objectives and Assessment; review the instructor guidance for Week 1 ; and review the links listed in the Week 1 assignment prompt.
Highlight your path:
PK -6 7-12 Corporate Trainer Military Trainer Healthcare Trainer Other: (type response here)
Name of Standards:
Virginia Fourth Grade Science Standard
Content Area: Science
Grade or Audience: Fourth Grade
Standard:
4.6: The student will investigate and understand how weather conditions and phenomena occur and can be predicted. Key concepts include
- a) weather measurements and meteorological tools (air pressure – barometer, wind speed – anemometer, rainfall – rain gauge, and temperature – thermometer); and
- b) weather phenomena (fronts, clouds, and storms).
Measurable Learning Objectives/Outcomes/Targets
- Students will be able to explain the purpose for various meteorological tools. (understanding)
- Students will be able to identify the different types of clouds. (remembering)
- Students will be able to demonstrate the impact that cold and warm fronts have on the weather. (applying)
Developing Measurable Learning Objectives 1
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow