Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Developing Your Prospectus Form
Developing Your Prospectus Form
Discussion: Secondary Datasets
In previous weeks, you developed research questions for your Doctoral Study Prospectus Form. The next step in developing your Prospectus Form is selecting a suitable data set. To determine an appropriate data set, there are a number of questions that you will need to consider. For example, is your research question on a global scale, or will you focus on a local community? Are you focusing on a single hospital or a hospital system? Are you looking at the Medicare population within a state, or comparing states? Do you have command of the language used in the data set? Are the data current enough or old enough for your needs? In this weeks Learning Resources, reminds us of some of the ethical sensitivities that arise with secondary data sources.
For this Discussion, you will research secondary data sources, select a secondary quantitative data set from these data sources to answer your research question, and explain the rationale behind your selection.
To prepare for this Discussion:
· Research various secondary data sources
· Select a secondary quantitative data set that could be used to help answer the research questions you developed in previous weeks
By Day 4
Submit a 3-paragraph post that includes the following:
1. The topic you have chosen for your Doctoral Study Prospectus
2. The research questions you have chosen
3. The secondary data set you would consider to answer your research questions and the rationale behind selecting it for this topic
Continuation of this work
https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/catherine-owens-20215321
35 research article that focuses on a study that used Jean Watsons Theory of Human Caring
Jean Watsons Theory of Human Caring is a conceptual thread in the College of Nursings curriculum framework. The purpose of this assignment is to offer students the opportunity to be exposed to Human Caring Science while providing students with the skills of critical appraisal of evidence.
1. Students will select one nursing research article that focuses on a study that used Jean Watsons Theory of Human Caring as a theoretical framework.
2. Students should use as a guide, an appropriate Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist found in Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt (2019; pp. 708-722).
3. The critiques are to be informal, although correct grammar, spelling, etc., are expected. The critique should include a brief description of the study that was reviewed and should address elements of the study relevant to critique.
4. Students will provide a written critique on a critical appraisal of the elements relevant to the nature of the research study such as type of study, design, quality of the study; and rationale, as well as implications for practice and further research and/or evaluation.
The grade will be based on accuracy, level of content and structure of the document.
Examples of research articles incorporating Jean Watsons theory in online library:
Durgun Ozan, Y., & Okumus, H. (2017). Effects of nursing care based on
Watsons theory of human caring on anxiety, distress, and coping when
infertility treatment fails: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Caring
Sciences, 6(2), 95-109.
Rossillao, K. (2018). Caritas education: Theory to practice…2018
National Teaching Institute research abstracts presented at the AACN
National Teaching Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, May 21-24, 2018.
American Journal of Critical Care, 27(3), e 14 – e15.
· Length: 4-5 pages (including title and reference pages)
· Format: Formal paper in APA 7th ed format
· Citations: If used (not required) cite references according to APA 7th e
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Developing Your Prospectus Form