Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company
Company X is an American manufacturing company getting ready to start selling its products in Mexico. You are the manager of a team tasked with assessing the potential risks to the company as it gets ready to expand to another country.
Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company
Create a 5- to 7-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint presentation, including detailed speaker’s notes, you could deliver to the Board of Directors discussing the risks the company could face.
Address the following points in your presentation:
Explain what risks the company could face in entering the market in Mexico
Explain how these risks might be different than those risks faced in staying in just the American market
Analyze how the company can manage these risks
Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company
&Write a 525-word weekly reflection that includes the following:
Summarize the discussion you had with your collaborative team.
Explain whether the firms your team discussed pursued an effective global expansion strategy.
Explain whether you would have chosen a different approach to global expansion and justify it.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines
Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Different Approach To Global Expansion Of A Company