Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Assignment on Performance Appraisal
A performance appraisal is a periodic evaluation of an employee’s job performance and contribution to the company’s goals. Performance appraisals are frequently conducted at the end of the year to evaluate employee performance and set goals for the following year. You will evaluate another HR and management function and its contribution to effective performance management in this assignment. Read the article Adapting the Performance Appraisal Process to Meet the Needs of the Modern Workplace before starting this assignment (Links to an external site.).
In your paper, you state:
Discuss how HR and management are involved in performance appraisals.
Examine the fundamental elements of a successful performance evaluation.
Describe how performance appraisals can help the organization achieve its goals and objectives.
Describe the benefits of performance evaluations and how they help with effective training and development.
When conducting a performance appraisal, explain potential forms of discrimination based on labor laws and regulations.
The paper on Performance Appraisal
The paper must be two to three double-spaced pages long (excluding the title and references pages) and formatted in APA style, as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.
A separate title page must be included with the following information:
Paper’s title
Name of the student
Name and number of the course
Name of the instructor
Date of submission
Refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 for more information on formatting and the title page (Links to an external site.).
An introduction and a conclusion paragraph are required.
Refer to the Writing Center resources for help with introductions and conclusions (Links to an external site.).
In addition to the course text, you must use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed, or credible sources.
Additional information on appropriate source types can be found in the Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table. Please contact your instructor if you have any questions about whether a particular source is appropriate for this assignment. Your instructor has the final say on whether or not a source is appropriate for a given assignment.
Any information from sources must be documented in APA style, as outlined in the Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.
A separate references page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center, must be included. For details, see the Writing Center’s Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion Assignment on Performance Appraisal |