Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Assignment on Speech Communication
Question 1: Please review your last week’s Informative Speech (if you presented during Keiser Live, please watch the posted replay). With a few sentences, respond to the following questions about your speech:
Identify three effective nonverbal delivery techniques used in your speech and explain why they were effective.
Identify three effective verbal delivery techniques in your speech and explain why they were effective.
Were there any vocalized pauses in your speech (i.e., um, uh, like, you know)? What can you do to improve this situation?
Identify and explain how your content was both effective and memorable when evaluating your speech from a content standpoint.
2nd question:
You have the option of watching one of three persuasive speeches. Please watch only one speech and then complete the following after you’ve finished watching it. Students must respond to questions B and C with at least one paragraph. To view the Persuasive Speech video you’ve chosen to evaluate, click on the links below.
For this speech, complete the required rubric (included as attachment above)
What are two of this speaker’s strengths?
What are two aspects of this speaker’s performance that could be improved?
Discussion Assignment on Speech Communication
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion Assignment on Speech Communication |
Discussion Assignment on Speech Communication