Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The prompt is as follows: The readings are attached. I’ll attach the lecture notes and class recordings that will assist you in answering this prompt 🙂
Discuss Roland Barthes’ understanding of the history of the author, and speculate on how he would react to auteurism’s continued dominance in cinema studies. Consider your own relationship to cinema, particularly why you watch the films that you do. Consider how, in the context of film financing and distribution, auteurism has perpetuated industrial practices that maintain the status quo (in terms of gender and race).
READ THE INTRODUCTION (pages 341-44)
Roland Barthes, The Death of the Author, 345-49, 1968.
BREATHLESS SCREEN (Jean-Luc Godard, 1959, 103m)
Recordings from class are available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FOvBKNul8Ba4gQiHJ…
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Is1WIb0Kq7wwjc-N5…
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v-9Sm7gCtc0miD6R3 (class recording 3; group discussion helpful for writing the essay)
Please use all of my professor’s previous feedback for the last essay you wrote for me, which I messaged you about today and asked you to respond to, and could you also take into account the other feedback she has previously given, which I’d appreciate a lot. I’d love it if you could write this paper like you wrote the last one, which I hope you listen to the voice recording for. Also, please make sure that you use Times New Roman font size 12 and that the works cited are included, as well as that it is formatted in MLA.
1st of 3 slides
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion of Film Directors Innovative Ideas |
Discussion of Film Directors Innovative Ideas