Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
I went to a National Park for the first time a few years back. Yosemite National Park is the national park that my family and I visited. This was my first visit to a gorgeous National Park in my entire life. If my memory serves me correctly, my
family and I visited the park over the summer. Because the weather in Yosemite is breezy and cold, and I could feel the pure air from the environment that I couldn’t sense in the city, we were really appreciating the natural beauty of the park.
\Furthermore, this was my first time viewing the world’s largest waterfalls and seeing a bear up close and personal with guests outside of a cage in a natural setting. When I first saw the bear, it offered me a very different nature sensation than
eeing it in a zoo. I hope that everyone has the opportunity to visit the National Park at least once in their lives since it will provide you with a wealth of unforgettable memories.
Discussion on a Visit to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on a Visit to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park |
Discussion on a Visit to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park