Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion on MED217 Dissertation Proposal
To begin typing, please click on the grey text box. The form will enlarge to accommodate your text.
Please make sure you fill out the entire form, including the Literature Review, which should be typed in 1.5 line spacing.
Name of the student (please print):
Program of Study:
The title of the topic has been agreed upon.
Please be as specific as possible in a maximum of 15 words:
a proposal outline
What is the topic of your investigation?
What exactly do you want to learn? This should be expressed as a question.
a critical examination (1000 words)
In your selected field of study, you should produce a critical summary of previous research.
Methodology
WHAT ARE YOUR PLANS FOR RESPONDING TO YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION? What method(s) will you use (textual analysis, media history, audience research, ethnographic methods, etc.)? Justify your decision with evidence from the literature.
Dissertation Structure Proposed
For example, a list of chapters with names and two or three phrases describing what you want to look at in each chapter.
Bibliography
Include, for example, suggested reading; sources for an empirical qualitative analysis; and available textual content.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion on MED217 Dissertation Proposal