Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
You will gain bonus points if you successfully answered the question. At the end of the semester, all bonus points will be added. This is a bonus project, which means it is neither essential nor optional.
This assignment is labeled with the phrase “This assignment does not count toward the final grade.” This is because the bonus points will be manually added to your midterm score at the end of the semester.
Choose one of three climate change-related topics. A. Rising sea levels, B. Wildfires, and C. Drought
You must find an article relevant to one of these themes in order to complete this homework. It could be a newspaper story, a blog post, or a peer-reviewed journal article. Write a short essay (no more than 300 words) that includes the following information:
1. Give the title, author, and source of the article on this topic, as well as a link to it online.
2. Write a summary of the article.
3. Based on your understanding of what we learned in class, make your own thoughts about this issue.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on the National Ocean Service’s website |
Discussion on the National Ocean Service’s website