Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Paper on Knowledge Reflection
Take some time to think on what you’ve learned so far in this course. Share the following with your classmates:
What did you learn in this course that you didn’t know before?
What is something you’ve discovered that you didn’t realize before?
How do you plan to/would you plan to incorporate this new understanding into your teaching? Give specific examples.
What concerns you the most about children’s behavior? What behavioral research do you need to conduct?
How are you going to get the answers or conduct the research?
BELOW ARE SOME OF THE THINGS I LEARNED IN THE COURSE.
Guidance, discipline, punishment, and consequences have different meanings.
Mistaken Behavior Levels Rewards vs. Punishment
Praise vs. Encouragement
Advice on Behaviour
Theories of Behaviorism and Constructivism
Timeouts are used in a variety of situations.
Building Positive Relationships by Treating Children with Respect
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion Paper on Knowledge Reflection