Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
You must watch the film The Great White Hoax-Donald Trump and the Politics of Race and Class in America to participate in this Discussion (available here and in our Module)
Participate in our weekly Discussion after seeing the aforementioned film by answering the following questions:
1. Racial scapegoating: What role did fear and danger play in Donald Trump’s appeals to American voters, according to Wise? Which voters did he appear to be targeting with his message?
2. Trumpism and Political Norms: Can you think of any previous examples of white politicians using racial “dog whistles” to engage with white audiences?
That their problems are caused by black and brown people?
3. Politics of Divide and Conquer: Why does Wise claim that Donald Trump “works like a walking, talking opioid”?
4. White Cultural Anxiety and Trumpism: What is cultural anxiety, and how did it contribute to Trump’s victory?
5. Anxiety in White Men: A Perfect Storm: When he was caught on camera glamorizing and making light of sexual assault, how did most Trump fans react? What are your thoughts on what these fans have said?
6. Learning from the Past: Despite increased levels of intolerance, bigotry, and white nationalism since Trump’s election, Wise sees reason for optimism.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|