Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1. Chapter 2 of Schwalbe explains how what he calls the rules of the game create an unfair system. He mentions on page 79 that the practice of redlining is a good example of “how rules work to create inequality that favors people who were not originally in a position to rig the game in their favor.” He goes on to say that children who benefited from redlining, who are now grown, “did not rig the game in their favor. They simply benefited from it later, most likely with no awareness of how those benefits originated in discriminatory rules of the game.” 1 Page
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNeR4bBUj68. A Peacock in the Land of Penguins
After viewing the diversity issues video, A Peacock in the Land of Penguins, create a post that gives the class an overview of your reaction to the diversity issues raised in the video. What were you thinking as you watched? What is your opinion about employees being expected to blend in? Do you think companies should adapt to the cultures of employees coming into the organization? Provide an experience or example related to one of your comments to make your point. 1 page
3. Write one-page report summary. to convey an understanding of the essence of a source material to readers, without them having to view it
A Peacock in the land of penguins
Lets Begin with LBJ- Affirmative action overview lesson
Diversity issue and discussion Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Diversity issue and discussion Assignment