Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Diversity of Life in The World Oceans Discussion
What I want you to do is put together another list of 10 questions based on this lesson (Life in the Nekton II-note that for most of the assignments, you only had to answer 5 questions). You must include the following: your name, directions, a due date, and finally the questions. You may use my posts as a guideline, but do NOT copy-and-paste your directions! We want to see how you would put an assignment together. You will be graded in the clarity of your directions and the rigor of your questions (they should be challenging, but not impossible for a non-major to answer). I will be evaluating your understanding of this section based on the types of questions you present, so make them good! Think about the types of questions you would ask to prepare for an exam, or to quiz a colleague.
Remember, you are setting the foundation for diversity of life in the world oceans.
Diversity of Life in The World Oceans Discussion
Diversity of Life in The World Oceans Discussion
Personal Experience with Healthcare Providers Patient Interview
Part of your Patient Interview Assignment was to ask your interviewee what they would like present or future health care providers to know about treating someone with their condition – something they would like you to share with the class to help future patients like them.
This “insiders’ perspective” insight could be about their condition, its treatment, or their personal experience as a human being who is suffering or in pain/discomfort.
1) Briefly & succinctly state your interviewee’s message to the class from their lived illness experience. State it in a few sentences (this post may be short).
Go ahead and post – then,
2) Read some other posts by your colleagues in this class. Choose posts from 2 other students which stood out to you as useful or true, to respond to with your own comments.
Again, these posts can be short –
Do you agree with their comment ? Why or why not ?
Did this comment fit with what you learned from your interviewee or your own experience ? Or was it different, even opposite ?
What does this mean for you if you were working in the future with patients who have serious or chronic conditions, whether in a health care setting, in a community setting, or even in a lab or environmental intervention setting ?
(Public Health is nearly always dealing with the public, one way or another ).
Diversity of Life in The World Oceans Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Diversity of Life in The World Oceans Discussion