Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Refernce chapters 11,12 from the textbook attached below
Problem Set #5
Earned-value analysis. A project budget calls for the following expenditures:
Task Date Budgeted Amount
Build forms April 1 $10,000
Pour foundation April 1 $50,000
May 1 $100,000
Frame walls May 1 $30,000
June 1 $30,000
Remaining tasks July 1 and beyond $500,000
Define each phrase in your own words, calculate the values for the project above, and present your findings:
Baseline costs budgeted (make a graph illustrating this one)
at the end of the project’s budget (BAC)
PV (planned value) as of May 1st
Earned value (EV) as of May 1 if just two-thirds of the foundation work has been completed. Everything else is running smoothly.
As of May 1, SV.
As of May 1, the actual cost is $160,000. As of May 1, calculate the cost variance (CV).
Index of schedule performance (SPI)
Index of cost-effectiveness (CPI)
Estimate to completion (ETC), presuming that historical cost deviations have no bearing on future costs.
Estimate at the end (EAC)
Length of explanation and response: 500 words
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Earned Value Analysis in Project Management |
Earned Value Analysis in Project Management