Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment Assignment
Must be all original work and done on time needs to have at least 2 sources.
my parenting styles are firm but I come down to their level as I do not want my children to fear me.
Effective Punishment
One aspect of raising healthy children is understanding how to best provide correction when they make poor choices or behave in unacceptable ways. Over the years, there has been much debate over the most effective form of punishment for children. As part of this debate, you have to take into consideration operant conditioning as this is the basis for how effective correction works. Operant conditioning should be considered when choosing how to best administer corrective actions whether the parents choose to use corporal punishment, time outs, or loss of privileges.
- Discuss the differences between negative and positive punishment. What are the factors that make punishment effective?
- Discuss the effectiveness of corporal punishment and elaborate upon when you think it should be used.
- Discuss how culture affects the type of punishment used.
- Give reasons in support of your responses based on your readings and personal experiences.
Write your initial response in 2–3 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By Saturday, June 28, 2014,
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
(MANAGEMENT/SALARIED/PSAM)
Employee Name: Security Number:
Job Title: Operations Manager Date of Hire: 6/27/2014
Location: Department: Warehouse
Date Current Position Began: Click here to enter a date. Date of Last Appraisal: 6/27/2014
Person Conducting this Appraisal:
Reason for Review: Annual Review
Instructions
Carefully evaluate employee’s work performance against established objectives and accountabilities. Assign a performance rating and a weighted score for each objective. Write the performance rating and the weighted score in the corresponding boxes. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section. Complete this form during year-end and mid-year reviews. Adjust goals based on business objectives if necessary at mid-year review.
Definitions of Categories
Objective: The objective describes what you will work on to achieve the business results in the coming year.
Accountabilities: The accountabilities define the tasks you will perform to meet the objective.
On-Target Performance Measures: The on-target performance measure is the expected or desired business result.
Actual Performance: The actual performance is the mid-year and/or annual performance results
Definition of Performance Ratings
5 = Significantly Above Target (SAT) – Performance significantly exceeded expectations.
4 = Above Target (AT) – Performance consistently exceeded expectations.
3 = On-Target (OT) – Performance met most and exceeded some expectations.
2 = Below Target (BT) – Performance met some but not all expectations.
1 = Significantly Below Target (SBT) – Performance is significantly below expectations.
Part I: Business Objective #1 Objective: Manage Bulk Loading Cases per Resource Hour Accountabilities (Process) On-Target Performance Measures
(Results) Actual Performance
Mid-Year Appraisal Comments: Year-End Appraisal Comments: How to calculate weighted score: 1. Multiply: .25 by each Business Objective performance rating.
Example: (AT) Above Target = 4 x .25 = 1.0 weighted score.
2. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section.
Note: A below target rating requires the development of specific action plans, a timetable, and frequent reviews to address the areas needing improvement.
Weighted Score/Performance Rating Choose an item.
Part I: Business Objective #2 Objective: Manage Loading Accuracy Accountabilities (Process) On-Target Performance Measures
(Results) Actual Performance
Mid-Year Appraisal Comments: Year-End Appraisal Comments: How to calculate weighted score: 1. Multiply: .25 by each Business Objective performance rating.
Example: (AT) Above Target = 4 x .25 = 1.0 weighted score.
2. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section.
Note: A below target rating requires the development of specific action plans, a timetable, and frequent reviews to address the areas needing improvement.
Weighted Score/Performance Rating Choose an item.
Part I: Business Objective #3 Objective: Safety and Housekeeping Accountabilities (Process) On-Target Performance Measures
(Results) Actual Performance
Mid-Year Appraisal Comments: . Year-End Appraisal Comments: How to calculate weighted score: 1. Multiply: .25 by each Business Objective performance rating.
Example: (AT) Above Target = 4 x .25 = 1.0 weighted score.
2. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section.
Note: A below target rating requires the development of specific action plans, a timetable, and frequent reviews to address the areas needing improvement.
Weighted Score/Performance Rating Choose an item.
Part II: People/Interpersonal Relationship Development Objective Objective: Development of bulk loader knowledge through cross-training Accountabilities (Process) On-Target Performance Measures
(Results) Actual Performance
Mid-Year Appraisal Comments: Year-End Appraisal Comments: How to calculate weighted score: 1. Multiply: .15 by each Business Objective performance rating.
Example: (AT) Above Target = 4 x .15 = .6 weighted score.
2. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section.
Note: A below target rating requires the development of specific action plans, a timetable, and frequent reviews to address the areas needing improvement.
Weighted Score/Performance Rating Choose an item.
Part III: Personal Development Objective Objective: Improve knowledge of Warehouse Operations Accountabilities (Process) On-Target Performance Measures
(Results) Actual Performance
Mid-Year Appraisal Comments: Year-End Appraisal Comments: How to calculate weighted score: 1. Multiply: .10 by each Business Objective performance rating.
Example: (AT) Above Target = 4 x .10 = .4 weighted score.
2. Add all weighted scores and record total on overall performance rating section.
Note: A below target rating requires the development of specific action plans, a timetable, and frequent reviews to address the areas needing improvement.
Weighted Score/Performance Rating Choose an item.
Part IV: Overall Performance Rating SBT Significantly Below Expectations
Score 0.00 – 1.59
BT Met Some But Not All Expectations
Score 1.60 – 2.59
OT Met Most and Exceeded Some Expectations
Score 2.60 – 3.59
AT Consistently Exceeded Expectations
Score 3.60 – 4.59
SAT Significantly Exceeded Expectations
Score 4.60 – 5.00
1 2 3 4 5
Part V: Overall Summary Comments:
Part VI: Salary Recommendation Pay Data Current Proposed % Change Salary
Part VII: Employee Year-End Comments (A separate sheet may be attached to this document.) This evaluation of performance against objectives has been reviewed with the employee.
Signature of Employee Date
Signature of Appraiser Date
Part VIII: Leadership/Management Assessment Towering Strength (TS) Demonstration of this competency is considered the benchmark or “gold standard.” Strength (S) Demonstration of this competency is above standard. At Standard (AS) Demonstration of this competency is at a high standard. Meets most expectations of consistent performance. Needs Improvement (NI) Demonstration of this competency does not yet meet standard. Not Demonstrated (ND) Individual has not demonstrated this competency. Not Applicable (NA) Competency does not apply to the job. Competencies TS S AS NI ND NA Comments Results Oriented Customer Focus Results Oriented Analytical Thinking Industry Knowledge Problem Solving Executional Excellence Influencing Business Acumen Planning & Organization Business Analysis Functional / Technical People Development Coaching Professional Maturity Development of Employees Communication Team Player
Part IX: Leadership Assessment Summary Summary and Development Strategy: Development Plan: Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow