Effectiveness of Total Quality Management Principles in DP World
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Effectiveness of Total Quality Management Principles in DP World
GROUP PROJECTS PROGRESS CHECKLIST
This checklist will guide you to report on progress on your group project as a part of their course. It will help you to manage your group activities effectively, increase group performance and maximize the benefits of group assessment.
Group Name AL Majlis Group Members Names 1- Ahmad Nasser ID 200015720 (team leader) 2- Soud albalushi ID 200000750
3- Sultan Alshamsi ID 200014767
4- Mohammad alsadi ID 200102947
5- Hassan Al Olama ID 200100967
Project title The Effectiveness of Total Quality Management Principles in DP World
Stages in-group work
Stage 1 – Planning and preparation Progress /date: February 19, 2019 This is the stage when your group should plan exactly what needs to be done, how it needs to be done, and who should do what.
Report on the following :
Did you agree on the best way of achieving these tasks by dividing areas of responsibility amongst the group, making sure that roles and time commitments are as evenly balanced as possible;
Did you agree on the different elements of the task (background research, written text, an overall design, graphs and images, final assembly and so on);
Did you divide the tasks up according to the skills of different group members; make an action plan of what needs to be done by who and when, working towards the final deadline.
Firstly, our group consists of six members, and Ahmad Nasser is the group leader. We have selected DP World to assess and analyze the effectiveness of TQM principals in the company, as we have distributed the tasks between us. Ahmad is going to gather all the tasks from the members after they’re done and work on the format of the report and PowerPoint presentation. Sultan are going to check the grammar and spelling errors before submitting the report.
We decided to finish the report in week 11, so there will be enough time to work on the PowerPoint (VIVA).
We have distributed the tasks as the following:
Hassan: Abstract (Purpose of the project) + Introduction (About TQM, thesis statement and what the case will include) + Conclusion & Recommendations.
Mohammad: Literature Review – Background (About the company, nature of the company, vision, mission)
Sultan: Organizational structure
Presentation of TQM – Ahmad: Paragraph analyzing TQM & 3 points of TQM principals in the company.
4 points of TQM principals in the company + supply chain.
Sultan: Measurement system of the company (product quality)
Soud: Six Sigma of the company.
Stage 2 – Implementation Progress report Whilst your group carries out its tasks, you will need to preserve your group’s sense of purpose. Effective communication is vital, particularly when your group activity extends over time.
Is the action plan being implemented towards the final deadline?
The update on the project process are been followed and closely monitored by the group leader (Ahmad), on the assigned task which has been agreed and acknowledged by each member. Although we have created a WhatsApp group as a communication tool, we do meet once every week to update each other on the progress, and if further assistance is required by any member in case he gets stuck with his task. Great team work effort by all. most of the tasks been completed by all members and since our group members been reduced from 6 to 5, one task is still remaining and been assigned to (Sultan) to complete the same by end of this week. All are on track and we shall work on writing the report and PowerPoint. The next update will follow on stage 3. Stage 3 – Completion Progress Report Planning effective oral presentations
If you are making a group presentation, make sure that this is written and rehearsed as a group.
Share opportunities for speaking rather than making one person do all the work (unless there are too many people in your group or there just is not enough time).
Change speakers in strategic places, using the different voices to structure your presentation (e.g. one person could take the introduction, another the main discussion, a third the conclusions).
Finally, use effective linking statements to announce the handover from one speaker to another
Writing a group report Did you divide responsibility for drafting sections between the different members of your group?
Who will take overall responsibility for pulling the final piece together?
Do you follow the approved guidelines in the course?
Preparing for your viva If you have been asked to discuss your group’s performance in a viva make sure that you meet to plan for this activity in the same way you planned your other work.
Allocate roles, time management and tasks.
Remember to talk about your group’s performance as a group rather than discussing the performance of individual group members.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results