Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Embracement of Focus Groups in Research May Not Be Effective
Respond to one of your colleagues’ posts with a suggestion about using a focus group for their research idea. Your suggestion may include 3–4 interview questions to ask, considerations for sampling; or how to manage recruiting participants. $5 post
When we began to think about collecting Data from individual participants and gathering data from participants in a focus group first thing that comes to mind is the closeness and comfortableness that one person could have from doing a one on one interview. Depending on the Information that you want to get a study on it could be better if you get clear information from one person . When a person is gathering information from one person I believe that it allows that interviewer and interviewee to have a re pour that will allow that person to be more vulnerable to reveal more in depth information verses one in a focus group . I think that focus groups can have a person views and opinions be more persuaded . I also think that a person will be able to have their views changed to conform to their peers thoughts and opinions . I am thinking about doing my research on juveniles who have committed crimes due to them being molested verses juveniles who commit crimes who haven’t been molested and I would like to see if that impact on their young environment pushed them to commit more Vivid crimes then those who haven’t been in that environment . I know that my topic is very broad but I am hoping to narrow it down and find the gap . I think that dealing with offenders could be difficult when they are set in a focus groups only because offenders tend to side with the majority verses having that open relationship in an individual atmosphere . I think that the topic of molestation can be very hard to talk about and dealing with an offenders age and the environment in what they were brought up in can weigh the outcome of the data that is being gathered.
When thinking about certain questions if I was to do a focus group I think about the chart .
The Letter “L” used for Laughter
The Letter “S” is used to represent sighing
the Letter “F” is used to represent frowning
The Letter “P” is used to represent Passion
I could possibly that these codes and utilize them in my data if I was to focus on a focus group type setting .
Gao, T., & Gurd, B. (2019). Organizational issues for the lean success in China: exploring a change strategy for lean success. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12…
Gao, T., & Gurd, B. (2019). Hospital size. Chart. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 6. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12…
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Embracement of Focus Groups in Research May Not Be Effective |
Embracement of Focus Groups in Research May Not Be Effective