Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
ENGL 102 Research Paper Grading Rubric
Research Paper Grading Rubric
ENGL 102 Research Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria Levels of Achievement Points Earned Excellent/Good Fair/Competent Deficient Development (CCLO #2)
65 to 75 points · Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported.
· Content is persuasive and comprehensive.
· Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
· Thesis has a strong claim.
· Audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.
· Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus.
51 to 64 points · Major points are addressed, but clarity or support is limited.
· Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive.
· Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity).
· Thesis could be stronger.
· Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing focus.
0 to 50 points · Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported.
· Content is missing essentials.
· Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.
· Supportive information (if required) is missing.
Organization and Structure (CCLO #1)
65 to 75 points · Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy-to-follow.
· Introduction is compelling and forecasts the topic and thesis.
· Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea.
· Transitional wording is present throughout the writing.
· Conclusion is a logical end to the writing.
· Word count is at least 1,500 words.
51 to 64 points · Paper is adequately organized, but some areas are difficult to follow.
· Introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing.
· Some paragraphs lack unity and coherence.
· Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas.
· Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose.
· Word count almost meets requirement.
0 to 50 points · Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.
· Introduction and/or conclusion is/are incomplete or missing.
· Paragraphs are not unified (e.g. more than 1 topic is included, missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences).
· Transitions are missing.
· Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose.
· Word count does not meet requirement.
Grammar and Diction (CCLO #1, #3)
65 to 75 points · The writing reflects correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling standards.
· Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
· The writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.
· 51 to 64 points · The writing contains some grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
· Language is unclear, awkward, or inappropriate in parts.
· The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.
0 to 50 points · The writing contains many grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
· Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate.
· The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate.
Format: Current MLA/APA/ Turabian Paper Requirements (CCLO #6)
18 to 25 points · Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.
· Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.
10 to 17 points · Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.
· Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.
0 to 9 points · Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.
· Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.
Total /250 Instructor’s Comments:
Page 1 of 2
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow ENGL 102 Research Paper Grading Rubric