Entrepreneurial Ideas Marketing Thread Discussion

May 31, 2022

Entrepreneurial Ideas Marketing Thread Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Entrepreneurial Ideas Marketing Thread Discussion

We all have our entrepreneurial ideas. Post a 200 word description of your entrepreneurial idea. Tell us about the differentiation of your idea and how this idea will add value to your target customers.

Post a 100 word advise to ONE (1) entrepreneurial idea from class, analyzing the idea at a critically reflective level.

International Marketing and Global Marketing Discussion

Question Description

Can you help me understand this Marketing question?

“International marketing is a term that is interchangeable with Global marketing”. Take a stand either agreeing with the statement or disagreeing. Give your rationale for your position (choose only one position, do not agree with both). Give relevant examples from international marketing to support your argument .

Marketing and Demand Planning Discussion

I’m working on a marketing discussion question and need an explanation to help me learn.

Market response models are intended to help scholars and managers understand how consumers individually and collectively respond to marketing activities, and how competitors interact. Discuss how demand planning supports this activity.

Entrepreneurial Ideas Marketing Thread Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met