Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Environmental Justice And Overpopulation Annotated Bibliography
Assignment Topic
This week, you will research and write a paper providing an annotated bibliography to develop a sociological understanding on the research questions (developed previously in Week 1) connected to a local example of environmental racism and environmental justice.
Assignment Directions
A basic component of academic research is the annotated bibliography. The annotated bibliography is a list of the sources you have found so far. The list is in alphabetical order as it would be on your reference page and includes a full citation for each source as it would appear on your reference page.
However, in addition, an annotated bibliography includes an annotation for each source, which is basically a summary of the source and some commentary on why the source is useful to your project.
Some steps to consider while developing your annotated bibliography are the following.
Assignment Deliverables
Your task this week is to write a paper that must fulfill the following requirements.
You will be graded based on the rubric below.
Rubric
Week 3: Course Project—Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric
Week 3: Course Project—Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric | ||||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeQuality of SourcesAll sources demonstrate careful consideration of validity and do not repeat the same information. |
|
20 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAccuracyIt includes the complete and accurate bibliographic citation for each source and is organized according to APA. |
|
20 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnnotations ContentThe summaries are accurate, the evaluation addresses the validity of the source, and usefulness for the assignment is included for every source. |
|
40 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnnotations StructureIt is well written, unique to the source, and avoids vague statements. It is the appropriate length. |
|
20 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOverall QualityThe bibliography could be used to generate a comprehensive research paper with excellent sources. |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Environmental Justice And Overpopulation Annotated Bibliography |
Environmental Justice And Overpopulation Annotated Bibliography