Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Environmental Science Golden Rice Debate Intro Discussion
I’m trying to study for my Environmental Science course and I need some help to understand this question.
Read the intro of “Golden Rice Debate Intro” that available in the attached file with another 2 more file (Pro & Con) and then decide what side ( consider that you are in pro side), and then organize your argument and write a paragraph about that you Pro side, and for Q2 write another paragraph about you have been assigned to be in Con side.
Q1 – What did you decide? Pro or Con for Golden Rice?
– For this question take Pro side and write a paragraph about it
Q2- Was this the same side that you were assigned?
– (Say no I was assigned to be in Con, and then start write about Con side)
To make it clear, you will take the both side (pro and con) the first time Pro, but for Con side you will start bay saying “No I was assigned for Con side………
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Environmental Science Golden Rice Debate Intro Discussion |
Environmental Science Golden Rice Debate Intro Discussion