Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Environmental Science & Health Personal Choices Paper
The purpose of this assignment is to consider how your personal choices affect environmental health and to asses alternatives that would improve any negative impact.
Choose five ways of reducing your impact on the environment that you could implement in your life (recycling, carpooling, water conservation, etc.) . In a 1–2-page paper explain how you could convince your friends and family that these changes are important.
please cite resources
Hilgenkamp, K. (2006). Environmental health: Ecological perspectives. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
It is the goal of this project to examine the influence that your own decisions have on environmental health and to suggest possible remedies.
Decide on five methods to reduce your environmental effect that you can put into practice in your daily life (such as recycling and carpooling). A 1- to 2-page paper explaining how you might persuade relatives and friends of the need of these changes is acceptable.
Please include citations for any information you provide.
In this case, K. Hilgenkamp is to be credited (2006). Ecological views on environmental health. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Environmental Science & Health Personal Choices Paper |
Environmental Science & Health Personal Choices Paper