Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Error Analysis Case Study Assignment
EDUC 530
EDUC 530
Error Analysis Case Study Assignment Instructions
You will write a current APA-formatted report responding to each of the case study prompts listed below. Your paper must be at least 1,200 words, and it must include proper headings and subheadings that are aligned with the grading rubric domains.
Access the Iris Center Case Study Unit: Identifying and Addressing Student Errors from the Module 5 Learn material. Read through the Case Study Unit, including all scenarios and the STAR (Strategies and Resources) Sheet.
Case Study Level A, Case 1 – Dalton (p. 3)
Student: Dalton
· Read Daltons scenario.
· Read the possible strategies and resources (STAR Sheets pp. 13-29) listed for Identifying and Addressing Student Errors.
· What type(s) of errors is evident
· How might you determine the reason students make this kind of error and what are some other examples of these types of errors?
· What strategies might you employ while addressing these error patterns?
· Write a detailed summary of each strategy, including its purpose.
· Describe why each strategy might be used to help Dalton improve.
Case Study Level A, Case 2 – Madison (p. 5)
Student: Madison
· Read Madisons scenario.
· Read the possible strategies and resources (STAR Sheets pp. 13-29) listed for Identifying and Addressing Student Errors.
· What type(s) of errors is evident
· How might you determine the reason students make this kind of error and what are some other examples of these types of errors?
· What strategies might you employ while addressing these error patterns?
· Write a detailed summary of each strategy, including its purpose.
· Describe why each strategy might be used to help Madison improve.
Case Study Level B, Case 2 Elias (p. 9)
Student: Elias
· Read Elias scenario.
· Read the possible strategies and resources (STAR Sheets pp. 13-29) listed for Identifying and Addressing Student Errors.
· What type(s) of errors is evident
· How might you determine the reason students make this kind of error and what are some other examples of these types of errors?
· What strategies might you employ while addressing these error patterns?
· Write a detailed summary of each strategy, including its purpose.
· Describe why each strategy might be used to help Elias improve.
Case Study Level C, Case 1 – Wyatt (p. 11)
Student: Wyatt
· Read Wyatts scenario.
· Read the possible strategies and resources (STAR Sheets pp. 13-29) listed for Identifying and Addressing Student Errors.
· What type(s) of errors is evident
· How might you determine the reason students make this kind of error and what are some other examples of these types of errors?
· What strategies might you employ while addressing these error patterns?
· Write a detailed summary of each strategy, including its purpose.
· Describe why each strategy might be used to help Wyatt improve.
In addition, your assignment must include the following:
· The case study must include a title and reference page formatted to current APA standards. There is no minimum number of references required.
· Each case study must be properly identified with corresponding headings.
· The case study must include professional, positive language.
Page 1 of 2
Curran, C., & the IRIS Center. (2003). Mathematics: Identifying and addressing student errors. Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf_case_studies/ics_matherr.pdf
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Error Analysis Case Study Assignment