ES 115 Bozeman Ben Campbell Discussion Assignment

September 16, 2022

ES 115 Bozeman Ben Campbell Discussion Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

ES 115 Bozeman Ben Campbell Discussion Assignment

I’m trying to study for my Writing course and I need some help to understand this question.

Who plays the main character Ben Campbell in the 2008 movie 21?

Ben’s dream in the movie 21 is to transfer to this school.

In the movie 21, the group of card counters is led by one of Ben’s professors. What subject does that professor teach?

In the card counters system in the movie 21, a spotter plays a table just betting minimum. The spotter keeps track of the card count and when the count is favorable the spotter gives a signal to another person. What is this person referred to as?

Ben, the protagonist in the movie 21, is emotionally distracted one night and continues to play after being signaled to leave. How much does he lose?

What happens to Ben when he returns to MIT in the movie 21?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met