Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
This project is intended to assist you in conducting sociological research and imagining a future career or life. Pose two simple questions to yourself, and then try to answer them using qualitative field research and archive research. These are the questions: 1) Who do you envision yourself/your “self” working with, among, or for in the future? And 2) in, around, and on what kinds of areas do you picture yourself/your “self” working? To answer these and other related questions, you must first locate at least FIVE published works on the profession of your choice, and then gather information about that profession from a variety of sources, including websites or reports from professional societies, the census bureau, news articles, and so on. In effect, you will conduct a content study of these resources in order to have a greater knowledge of what the profession includes, who performs it, where it is performed, and what role it plays in modern society.
Please include a bibliography at the end of your work, as well as an appendix with your “Statement of Purpose.”
I’ll include a purpose stated below. Without the bibliography, this should be six pages long. If you’re thinking about becoming a firefighter, read the purpose statement first.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|