Ethical Issues That May Arise In Public Administration
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Issues That May Arise In Public Administration
PART 1 – Answer in 100 to 200 words
Can you identify a case of public administration with which you are familiar where the official violated his or her public trust, in your view? If so, what seems to have been the cause?
How was the breach of trust discovered, and how was the issue resolved? Do you believe the resolution was the best one possible?
Do you think public administrative corruption is a serious problem in the United States relative to corruption among elected officials? If you see a disparity, what might account for it? What can it teach us about accountability?
What was your take away from the Neville Isdell’s Speech on Ethics?
Can an administrator combine doing well for government (efficiency and effectiveness) and doing the public good (customer satisfaction)? If so, how? If not, why?
What three concepts or techniques from this course might affect your current or future career in public administration? Discuss one of these concepts in detail.
What public policy issue might present difficulties for a public administrator in terms of meeting both legal mandates and constituents’ needs or demands? How can a conflict of interest affect ethical decision-making?
What are the common ethical issues that may arise in public administration?
Analyze the relationship between doing well for government and doing the public good
PART 2 – Ethical Controversy Presentation
Analyze the coverage of public administration topics and issues in a variety of news media sources and outlets.
TOPIC: Wells Fargo case in 2015 where employees were creating accounts without customer’s permission the topic should have display (data, research, meat on the bones so to speak, etc.)
Develop an 8- to 10-slide presentation that includes the following:
- A description of the issue and its historical relevance in the field of public administration.
- Identification and evaluation of any case studies related to this issue and the impact on administrative decisions.
- Key ethical questions or activities that impact the issue.
- Major stakeholders impacted by the issue.
- How a public administrator might successfully manage the issue while retaining ethical standards from a community perspective.
Include speaker’s notes throughout the presentation.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Issues That May Arise In Public Administration