Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
Case Scenario 1: James, 14, has a cleft lip and palate and requires a standard procedure that will considerably improve both his appearance and his communication. James has had a hard time fitting in with his peers because of his appearance, and he has few friends. The boy’s father, a mental healer, refuses to allow the operation or even discuss it with the doctor. The doctor explains the procedure to James, who expresses a wish to use natural forces to close the cleft palate.
Question 1: What ethical concepts, such as autonomy, informed consent, beneficence, or nonmaleficence, justify James’ decision not to have surgery? What ethical principles take precedence over James’ refusal to undergo surgery? Is James capable of consenting to or refusing treatment?
Question 2: Is it necessary for the physician to respect the patient’s refusal of operation based on your analysis? If not, what ethically acceptable options does the physician have?
Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
Each of the questions that follow the case scenario must be answered in the form of a 250-word paragraph with well-developed sentences, correct spelling, and perfect syntax. To improve the quality of your analysis, you may conduct research on the medical condition, ethical principles, or legal precedents, but you may not include any details about ulterior intentions or extenuating circumstances in your response. It’s critical to go over the class goals again and make sure your response demonstrates that you met them. As a result, please support your main point using statistics, facts, important terminology, specific examples, and direct citations from the textbook and other sources. Please see the Online Writing Lab or the Tutoring page for help with writing.
Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
Use the author’s last name, the year of publication, and page numbers in parenthesis in the text to cite all sources of material, including your textbook; for example: (Author’s last name, year, p. ###). At the end of the assignment, include a reference list formatted like this for a book: Author’s surname and initials. (year). the title (edition in parentheses). Publisher’s address: Publisher’s name For additional information, or to see examples of the formats needed for different sorts of resources, see
Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Principles and Unlawful State
Ethical Principles and Unlawful State