Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Ethical Reasoning Method Rationale and Citations Discussion
Instructions:
For each answer, please include rationale and citations to provide support. You may use outside resources and research, but the expectation is that the majority of the citations will come from the course readings/presentations.
Business writing skills are essential for effective business practices. Business writing means clear, concise, and persuasive. Please answer the below questions in NO MORE THAN the page limit specified at the end of the question. (Double spaced Times Roman 12ft font, 1 in margins (if you do it right, the page limit might be challenging)).
1.Apply the Baird Method to the following ethical dilemma (yes, this is similar to the case that we worked out for the ethical reasoning model in class – this is intentional). 1 page (20 pts)
You are about to make a major hire for your sales team. As the sales manager, you have the final say in which of the three final candidates will get the offer. The last step of your hiring process is to check references. You decide that you will see if the applicants have a FaceBook® page and see what information you can glean from that site. On the unsecure wall of your favorite candidate, you discover that she has several threads of conversation about the political situation in Russia. Some of the people whose conversations she is following are advocating going against the government, even to demonstrations and other acts of civil disobedience.
What would you do given that one of you major markets is Russia, you find yourself wondering if someone who is against the current system in Russia would in fact be a good sales rep in that market?
2 – In your opinion, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the ethical reasoning method vs. the Baird method? Can you support this opinion? Lastly, do you think that you should exclusively use one over the other? 1 page (10 pts)
3- What should organizational leaders do to create more ethical organizations (broad question, I know!) 1 page (10 pts)
4- In your own words, describe Baird’s four ethical perspectives.Even though it is said that no one lens is better than the other, do you think that one is better for leadership positions (answers will and should vary). 1 page (10 pts)
5–What are your most pressing issues surrounding moral intelligence (emotional or otherwise)? Are these reflected in your Baird ethical perspective? ½ page (10 pts)
6–In your own words, what does it mean to be morally intelligent and why is it important? ½ page (10 pts)
7–What can we do as organizations and as individuals about the Romance of Leadership and to limit the negative impact of unethical leaders? ½ page (10 pts)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ethical Reasoning Method Rationale and Citations Discussion |
Ethical Reasoning Method Rationale and Citations Discussion