Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions
As you consider potential places of employment for the future, think about work settings that might require special ethical considerations.
Describe three work settings that present special ethical challenges or considerations. Explain why these settings would be challenging or additional considerations should be taken.
In response to your peers, give at least one example of a conflict outside of one of the work settings that could have potential repercussions at work. Discuss how these work settings could be affected by behaviors or personal choices outside of the work environment.
PLEASE USE ARTICLES AND TEXTBOOK AS REFERENCE AND APA IN TEXT CITATIONS
Textbook: Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions: Standards and Cases, Chapter 15
Chapter 15 addresses challenging work settings and a professional’s responsibility to understand basic ethical considerations as well as the special characteristics and challenges entailed in certain environments where you may deliver services.Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow