Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
European Perspectives of the Ottoman Empire
Module 8 Discussion: European Perspectives of the Ottoman Empire
11 unread replies.11 reply.
Below are links to the two readings on the Ottoman Empire. The first document was an account by the Englishman James Ludlow, who reported on the Janissary system in the Ottoman Empire. The second document is an excerpt from Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq’s The Turkish Letters, a compendium of personal correspondence to Busbecq’s friend Nicholas Michault. Busbecq served as an ambassador to the Ottoman Empire for the Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand, and he wrote about his experience in the Ottoman Empire under Süleyman the Magnificent. In this except, Busbecq describes the famous Janissaries of the Ottoman military.
Please read the two documents and answer the following discussion questions in no less than 200 words
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/islam/1493janissaries.asp
Source: “James M. Ludlow: The Tribute of Children, 1493,” Internet History Sourcebook
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1555busbecq.asp
Source: “Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq: The Turkish Letters, 1555-1562,” Internet History Sourcebook
Discussion Questions:
European Perspectives of the Ottoman Empire
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
European Perspectives of the Ottoman Empire |
European Perspectives of the Ottoman Empire