Evaluating the acceptance of cloud-based productivity computer
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Evaluating the acceptance of cloud-based productivity computer
1. Provide a summary of the research methods in each dissertation.
Quantitative Methodology:
Dominguez, A. (2013). Evaluating the acceptance of cloud-based productivity computer solutions in small and medium enterprises (Order No. 3557596). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ Capella University; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1346194891).Qualitative Methodology:
Burkhead, R. L. (2014). A phenomenological study of information security incidents experienced by information security professionals providing corporate information security incident management (Order No. 3682325). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ Capella University; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1657429053).Mixed Methods:
Srinivas, S. K. (2018). Security analytics tools and implementation success factors: Instrument development using delphi approach and exploratory factor analysis (Order No. 10807845). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ Capella University; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2050214687).2.
Describe your concentration in the Ph.D. program. Then identify the top journals in your concentration. Here is a list of journals that are considered top journals.
Journal Databases on the UC Library Proquest, ACM, and IEEE:
Journal of the ACM
Communications of the ACM IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Journal of Cryptology
Software and Systems Modeling
Journal of Machine Learning Research
IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering
Journal of Systems and Software
MIS Quarterly
Information Systems Research
Management Science
Journal of Management Info. Systems
Decision Sciences
Communications of the ACM
Decision Support Systems
European Journal of Info. Systems
ACM Transactions
Journal of AIS
Information Systems
ACM Computing Surveys
Journal of Information Systems
Journal of Strategic Info. Systems
Information and Management
Communications of the AIS
Journal of Database Management
Journal of Information Management
DATA BASE
Journal of Computer Info. Systems
Info. Resources Management Journal
Journal of Management Systems
Journal of the ACM
Omega
Journal of Info. Systems Management
Journal of Information Science
Human-Computer Interaction
Operations Research
Interfaces (INFORMS)
Int’l Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Journal of Information Systems Educ.
Knowledge Based Systems
Journal of Operations Research
Journal of Data Base Administration
Journal of Systems and Software
Expert Systems with Applications
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Journal of Systems Management
INFORM
Expert Systems Review
Journal of End-User Computing
Behavior and Information Technology
Communication Research
Simulation
AI Expert
Journal of Software Maintenance
Computers and Automation
Computers in Human Behavior
Look at these journals and identify two journals that have articles in your area of interest. Discuss why you selected each journal.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!