Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy
As discussed earlier in this course, your personal teaching philosophy is a work in progress. During week 8, you will revisit and revise your teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1. As part of this assignment, you should evaluate your original philosophy and include a one-page discussion of how your thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed and developed during this course. Guidelines for revising your teaching philosophy and the one-page discussion are below.
Assignment Guidelines
Revised Personal Teaching Philosophy (3 pages)
- Reflect on the teaching principles and practices discussed during the course.
- What did you learn about teaching that you did not know prior to this course?
- What stood out as important to you over the past 8 weeks?
- Consider how you might expand, adapt, or change your original philosophy to your current perspective on teaching (or you may feel compelled to take it in a completely new direction).
- Your revised teaching philosophy should:
- Have a clear focus or theme.
- Be authentic and personal.
- Relay who you are (or aspire to be) as a teacher.
- Exhibit genuine enthusiasm for teaching.
- Clearly express your current teaching values and beliefs, and discuss why you hold those values and beliefs (whether or not they have changed).
- Describe your current teaching goals (whether or not they have changed).
- Explain the teaching methods or strategies that you believe are best (whether or not they are different from your original philosophy). Note: make sure the teaching methods you find best are consistent with your goals.
- Incorporate any new ideas and/or practices that encourage a rich teaching and learning experience.
- Be well written, using a first-person narrative and present tense.
- Follow APA style.
- Have no any grammatical, typographical, or spelling errors.
Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy (1 page)
As part of this revised teaching philosophy assignment, you should include a discussion evaluating how your personal thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed during this course.
- After you have revised your personal teaching philosophy, carefully review your original teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1 of this course.
- Compare your original philosophy to your revised teaching philosophy and evaluate the following in a one-page written discussion:
- Have your teaching goals, methods, or strategies changed, and if so, how and why? Have your teaching priorities and/or perspectives changed or shifted, and if so, how and why?
- Do you value different learning experiences, and if so, what are they and why?
- Include any additional information that may highlight how your thoughts and ideas have changed or developed during this course.
- Include references that you found helpful, insightful, or meaningful in the development of your philosophy of teaching.
- In addition to the course texts, include at least two outside sources from peer-reviewed journals to support your ideas.
- Your evaluation discussion should:
- Be well written, using a first-person narrative and present tense.
- Follow APA style.
Total of 4 pages
Please separate with headers
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow