Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Examine Change Capacity
Create a Change/Intervention Plan on the basis of your community and organizational evaluation to solve the service or community gap you identified. Once this problem has been identified, prepare a proposal for community leaders and political authorities that includes:
Start by quickly describing the community and identifying gaps in services or needs.
Defining the parties involved in the anticipated change.
Examine change capacity.
Choose a method to change and ensure that your advice is justified (s).
Support your task with at least three academic resources. https://bestofassignment.com/management/leadership-change-in-a-digital-agecoursework-critically-analyse-leadership-pra/ Other acceptable scientific resources, particularly seminal papers, may be added in addition to those listed resources.
Length: 4-6 pages with no title and reference pages included Your job should show a careful evaluation of the ideas and concepts provided in the course by giving new ideas and insights directly related to the topic. Your response should follow the current APA standards and scholarly writing. Be careful you comply with the Integrity Policy of ACC. https://homeworkhelpersblog.com/please-see-the-attached-document-living-arrangements-and-well-being-for-the-de-2/ Upload your BlackBoard document
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Examine Change Capacity