Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
(Student Name)
Miami Regional University
Date Of Encounter:
Preceptor/Clinical Site:
Clinical Instructor: Patricio Bidart Msn, Aprn, Fnp-C
Soap Note # ____ Main Diagnosis ______________
Patient Information
Name:
Age:
Gender At Birth:
Gender Identity:
Source:
Allergies:
Current Medications:
Pmh:
Immunizations:
Preventive Care:
Surgical History:
Family History:
Social History:
Sexual Orientation:
Nutrition History:
Subjective Data:
Chief Complaint:
Symptom Analysis/Hpi:
The Patient Is …
Review Of Systems (Ros) (This Section Is What The Patient Says, Therefore Should State Pt Denies, Or Pt States….. )
Constitutional:
Neurologic:
Heent:
Respiratory:
Cardiovascular:
Gastrointestinal:
Genitourinary:
Musculoskeletal:
Skin:
Objective Data:
Vital Signs:
General Apprearance:
Neurologic:
Heent:
Cardiovascular:
Respiratory:
Gastrointestinal:
Muskuloskeletal:
Integumentary:
Assessment:
(In a paragraph please state “your encounter with your patient and your findings ( including subjective and objective data)
Example : “Pt came in to our clinic c/o of ear pain. Pt states that the pain started 3 days ago after swimming. Pt denies discharge etc… on examination I noted this and that etc.)
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
Main Diagnosis
(Include the name of your Main Diagnosis along with its ICD10 I10. (Look at PDF example provided) Include the in-text reference/s as per APA style 6th or 7th Edition.
Differential diagnosis (minimum 3)
PLAN:
Labs and Diagnostic Test to be ordered (if applicable)
–
–
Pharmacological treatment:
–
Non-Pharmacologic treatment:
Education (provide the most relevant ones tailored to your patient)
Follow-ups/Referrals
References (in APA Style)
Examples
Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.).
ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0
Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2010). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2010
(25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).
Soap Note 2 Adult Wellness Check Up /Annual physical
Note: Wellness check up or Annual physical exam can only have two possible diagnoses. ICD 10: Z00.00 or Z00.01. Any other abnormal finding should be placed in the differential diagnosis and clearly supported in your progress note under assessment.
Please keep this in mind. No other possible diagnosis for this encounter is accepted for any insurance. You must include all the USPSTF recommendation according to your patient age and sex under Planning.
This soap needs to be done for a patient between the ages of 23 to 69. Please see the video (https://youtu.be/NYqB-2frWfc) provided in the previous assignment BEFORE starting your SOAP note.
Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)
Turn it in Score must be less than 25% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25%. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated.
Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.
The use of Templates is ok with regards to Turn it in, but the Patient History, CC, HPI, The Assessment and Plan should be of your own work and individualized to your made-up patient.
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
NOTES:
We need to choose a patient AGE clinic history for Adult Wellness Check Up /Annual physical them: You must include all the USPSTF recommendation according to your patient age and sex under Planning.
Use a template attached, own words No plagiarism, references APA 7th edition
Discussion Question 1: Mapping the Interests for Both Parties
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
In the reading Get All the Interests Right , the authors (Lax & Sebenius, 2006) suggest that mapping the interests of your organization and their organization is a serious, ongoing priority that enables you to improve your current position. Based on your own professional or personal experiences, discuss an instance when you could have given greater credence to the Social Contract (p. 6) implications of a negotiated process. How do these interests differ from the traditional focus on the Economic Contract? Please be specific. (Use Get all the interests right document to answer this question)
Discussion question 2: When and how should strategy be tailored to particular locations?( Use Baxter’s Asia Pacific “Talent Edge” Initiative attachment to answer this question)
Discussion question 3: Can multinationals wield competitive advantage by aggressively hiring talented members of the excluded social group in each market? (Use Baxter’s Asia Pacific “Talent Edge” Initiative attachment to answer this question)
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review