Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description of the question
I’m working on a multi-part political science question and would like a sample draft to help me learn.
Readings
Don Yaeger | It’s Not About the Truth
Lectures on Video
Fantastic Lies (ESPN Films 30 for 30)
COMPLETE THESE TWO PARTS IN TWO DIFFERENT FILES.
1. Deliberation (APA format)
Answer each of the questions/prompts below with 1-2 paragraphs utilizing topics from the text or your own research before the mid-week deadline, based on your readings and video lectures (be sure to cite correctly).
Question
Explain why this became a national story in your own words. What breathed life into the story?
What would you have done differently if you were the District Attorney?
2. Keep a journal (APA format)
INSTRUCTIONS
The Reflective Journal is a tool for evaluating your comprehension of given texts, lectures, and videos. It’s also a way for you to show how you’ll put your readings and observations to use in your daily life.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|