Financial Analysis for healthcare organizations
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
For this case you will assume the role of Dr. William Harrison, a cardiologist and the director of Cavalier Hospital’s new Rotunda Cardiovascular Center. There are three attached files associated with this case:
- The case – cavalier hospital
- Supplement 1 – Financial Analysis for healthcare organizations
- Supplement 2- business performance evaluation
In your role as Dr. Harrison, you need to review the financial performance of Cavalier hospital and prepare for a meeting with the governing board.
Questions:
- Based on the information in the three files, please define and describe how to interpret each of the following financial indicators:
- Profitability Ratios:
- Operating margin (AKA Profit margin)
- Return on equity (ROE)
- Net Revenue Ratios:
- Contractual Allowances Percentage
- Charity Care Percentage
- Asset Management Ratios :
- Days cash on hand
- Total asset turnover
- Current asset turnover
- Liability and Liquidity Ratios
- Current ratio
- Debt-to-equity
- Is Cavalier Hospital financially healthy or sick? – Summarize each of the following financial indicators for Cavalier in relation to changes or trends over time and in comparison, to “comparable” healthcare organizations.
- Profitability Ratios:
- Operating margin (AKA Profit margin)
- Return on equity (ROE)
- Net Revenue Ratios:
- Contractual Allowances Percentage
- Charity Care Percentage
- Asset Management Ratios :
- Days cash on hand
- Total asset turnover
- Current asset turnover
- Liability and Liquidity Ratios
- Current ratio
- Debt-to-equity
- Do you have any concerns regarding the following? Why/why not?
- Contractual allowances
- The Rotunda center
- The expansion of Hamilton hospital
- How has Cavalier’s position changed financially after the opening of the Rotunda Cardiovascular Center?
- What is Harrison’s rationale for seeking capitated payments? Do you foresee any perverse incentives by having some of the patients on a capitation reimbursement structure and others on a fee-for-service model?
- Should Harrison advocate an expansion of the Rotunda model across all specialties in the hospital? If so, what financial trends should he seek to continue or reverse in implementing the new model?
NOTE: there is no specific number of words or pages as long as you do all the requirements. Just make sure to talk and explain all the requirements. EACH point one by one.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Financial Analysis for healthcare organizations